CompreFace vs motionEye
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CompreFace
Self-hosted face recognition service with REST API
VS
motionEye
Web frontend for the Motion video surveillance program
| Feature | CompreFace | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,173 | ★ 4,651 |
| First released | 2020 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Amazon Rekognition | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is CompreFace or motionEye better?
Neither is universally better. CompreFace has the larger community, while motionEye is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CompreFace and motionEye free and open-source?
Yes. CompreFace is licensed under Apache-2.0 and motionEye under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CompreFace and motionEye with Docker?
CompreFace: yes. motionEye: yes.