Bluecherry vs motionEye
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bluecherry
Open-source IP camera surveillance and NVR application
VS
motionEye
Web frontend for the Motion video surveillance program
| Feature | Bluecherry | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 274 | ★ 4,651 |
| First released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Milestone XProtect | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Choose Bluecherry if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is Bluecherry or motionEye better?
motionEye is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Bluecherry if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Bluecherry and motionEye free and open-source?
Yes. Bluecherry is licensed under GPL-2.0 and motionEye under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bluecherry and motionEye with Docker?
Bluecherry: yes. motionEye: yes.