go2rtc vs motionEye
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
go2rtc
Ultimate camera streaming gateway with low latency
VS
motionEye
Web frontend for the Motion video surveillance program
| Feature | go2rtc | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,837 | ★ 4,651 |
| First released | 2022 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is go2rtc or motionEye better?
Neither is universally better. go2rtc has the larger community, while motionEye is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are go2rtc and motionEye free and open-source?
Yes. go2rtc is licensed under MIT and motionEye under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run go2rtc and motionEye with Docker?
go2rtc: yes. motionEye: yes.