Kerberos Agent vs motionEye
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kerberos Agent
Lightweight video surveillance agent for a single camera
VS
motionEye
Web frontend for the Motion video surveillance program
| Feature | Kerberos Agent | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,088 | ★ 4,651 |
| First released | 2014 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Choose Kerberos Agent if…
- Lightweight per-camera model
- Scales with orchestration
Frequently asked questions
Is Kerberos Agent or motionEye better?
motionEye is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Kerberos Agent if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Kerberos Agent and motionEye free and open-source?
Yes. Kerberos Agent is licensed under MIT and motionEye under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kerberos Agent and motionEye with Docker?
Kerberos Agent: yes. motionEye: yes.