Frigate Mobile Companion vs MediaMTX
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Frigate Mobile Companion
Network video recorder front-end for review and clips
VS
MediaMTX
Ready-to-use media server and RTSP/WebRTC proxy
| Feature | Frigate Mobile Companion | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | HTML | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,150 | ★ 19,747 |
| First released | 2015 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Wowza | Wowza |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Mobile Companion if…
- Easy to publish camera feeds
- Polished interface
Frequently asked questions
Is Frigate Mobile Companion or MediaMTX better?
Neither is universally better. MediaMTX has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Frigate Mobile Companion and MediaMTX free and open-source?
Yes. Frigate Mobile Companion is licensed under Apache-2.0 and MediaMTX under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Frigate Mobile Companion and MediaMTX with Docker?
Frigate Mobile Companion: yes. MediaMTX: yes.
Related comparisons
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Agent DVR
- MediaMTX vs Agent DVR
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs WebRTC Camera
- MediaMTX vs WebRTC Camera
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Ant Media Server Community Edition
- MediaMTX vs Ant Media Server Community Edition
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Bluecherry
- MediaMTX vs Bluecherry
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs camera-streamer
- MediaMTX vs camera-streamer