Concrete CMS vs Lektor
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Concrete CMS
In-context editing CMS for marketers and site owners
VS
Lektor
Static CMS with a built-in admin interface
| Feature | Concrete CMS | Lektor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 850 | ★ 3,946 |
| First released | 2008 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Wix, Squarespace | WordPress, Squarespace |
Why pick each one
Choose Concrete CMS if…
- Very approachable for non-technical editors
- No separate admin needed for content
Frequently asked questions
Is Concrete CMS or Lektor better?
Neither is universally better. Lektor has the larger community, while Concrete CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Concrete CMS and Lektor free and open-source?
Yes. Concrete CMS is licensed under MIT and Lektor under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Concrete CMS and Lektor with Docker?
Concrete CMS: yes. Lektor: check the project docs for container support.