Bludit vs Concrete CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bludit
Simple flat-file CMS for fast websites and blogs
VS
Concrete CMS
In-context editing CMS for marketers and site owners
| Feature | Bludit | Concrete CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,464 | ★ 850 |
| First released | 2015 | 2008 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Wix | Wix, Squarespace |
Why pick each one
Choose Concrete CMS if…
- Very approachable for non-technical editors
- No separate admin needed for content
Frequently asked questions
Is Bludit or Concrete CMS better?
Neither is universally better. Bludit has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Bludit and Concrete CMS free and open-source?
Yes. Bludit is licensed under MIT and Concrete CMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bludit and Concrete CMS with Docker?
Bludit: yes. Concrete CMS: yes.