Concrete CMS vs Grav
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Concrete CMS
In-context editing CMS for marketers and site owners
VS
Grav
Fast flat-file CMS with no database required
| Feature | Concrete CMS | Grav |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 850 | ★ 15,620 |
| First released | 2008 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Wix, Squarespace | WordPress, Squarespace |
Why pick each one
Choose Concrete CMS if…
- Very approachable for non-technical editors
- No separate admin needed for content
Frequently asked questions
Is Concrete CMS or Grav better?
Neither is universally better. Grav has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Concrete CMS and Grav free and open-source?
Yes. Concrete CMS is licensed under MIT and Grav under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Concrete CMS and Grav with Docker?
Concrete CMS: yes. Grav: yes.