Concrete CMS vs ImpressPages

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureConcrete CMSImpressPages
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score82 · Excellent13 · At risk
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPPHP
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 852★ 500
First released20082012
ReplacesWix, SquarespaceWordPress, Wix

What are Concrete CMS and ImpressPages?

Concrete CMS

Concrete CMS is an open-source content management system known for its intuitive in-context editing, letting users edit pages directly on the front end. It targets non-technical website owners who want easy visual control.

  • In-context front-end editing
  • Drag-and-drop block layouts
  • Built-in marketplace
  • Workflow and versioning

ImpressPages

ImpressPages is an open-source PHP content management system featuring an intuitive inline editor with drag-and-drop layout building. It targets users who want a simple, visual way to manage small to medium websites.

  • Inline drag-and-drop editing
  • MVC architecture
  • Plugin and theme support
  • Beginner friendly

Concrete CMS vs ImpressPages: key differences

Both projects are written in PHP. Licensing differs — MIT for Concrete CMS versus GPL-3.0 for ImpressPages. ImpressPages is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Concrete CMS. Concrete CMS is the more established project (first released 2008), while ImpressPages arrived in 2012.

Why pick each one

Choose Concrete CMS if…

  • Very approachable for non-technical editors
  • No separate admin needed for content

Watch out for

  • Smaller community
  • Fewer themes available
Concrete CMS details

Choose ImpressPages if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP

Watch out for

  • Maintenance has slowed
  • Smaller ecosystem
ImpressPages details

Frequently asked questions

Is Concrete CMS or ImpressPages better?

Neither is universally better. Concrete CMS has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Concrete CMS and ImpressPages free and open-source?

Yes. Concrete CMS is licensed under MIT and ImpressPages under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Concrete CMS and ImpressPages with Docker?

Concrete CMS: yes. ImpressPages: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Concrete CMS or ImpressPages?

ImpressPages has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Concrete CMS. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons