Concrete CMS vs Microweber

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureConcrete CMSMicroweber
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score82 · Excellent79 · Good
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePHPHTML
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 852★ 3,439
First released20082013
ReplacesWix, SquarespaceWordPress, Wix

What are Concrete CMS and Microweber?

Concrete CMS

Concrete CMS is an open-source content management system known for its intuitive in-context editing, letting users edit pages directly on the front end. It targets non-technical website owners who want easy visual control.

  • In-context front-end editing
  • Drag-and-drop block layouts
  • Built-in marketplace
  • Workflow and versioning

Microweber

Microweber is an open-source drag-and-drop website builder and content management system that includes blogging and e-commerce features. It uses a live editing interface so content can be arranged visually on the page.

  • Live drag-and-drop editing
  • Built-in online store
  • Blogging module
  • Template marketplace

Concrete CMS vs Microweber: key differences

Concrete CMS is written in PHP, while Microweber is built with HTML. Concrete CMS is the more established project (first released 2008), while Microweber arrived in 2013. Microweber has the considerably larger community, at 3,439 GitHub stars versus 852.

Why pick each one

Choose Concrete CMS if…

  • Very approachable for non-technical editors
  • No separate admin needed for content

Watch out for

  • Smaller community
  • Fewer themes available
Concrete CMS details

Choose Microweber if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
  • Written in HTML
Microweber details

Frequently asked questions

Is Concrete CMS or Microweber better?

Neither is universally better. Microweber has the larger community, while Concrete CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Concrete CMS and Microweber free and open-source?

Yes. Concrete CMS is licensed under MIT and Microweber under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Concrete CMS and Microweber with Docker?

Concrete CMS: yes. Microweber: yes.

Related comparisons