Bludit vs Microweber
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Bludit
Simple flat-file CMS for fast websites and blogs
VS
Microweber
Drag-and-drop CMS with built-in online store
| Feature | Bludit | Microweber |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 83 · Excellent | 79 · Good |
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,469 | ★ 3,439 |
| First released | 2015 | 2013 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Wix | WordPress, Wix |
What are Bludit and Microweber?
Bludit
Bludit is a lightweight flat-file CMS that stores content in JSON files, requiring no database. It is aimed at users who want a quick, simple website or blog without complex setup.
- No database needed
- Plugin and theme support
- Markdown editor
- Quick installation
Microweber
Microweber is an open-source drag-and-drop website builder and content management system that includes blogging and e-commerce features. It uses a live editing interface so content can be arranged visually on the page.
- Live drag-and-drop editing
- Built-in online store
- Blogging module
- Template marketplace
Bludit vs Microweber: key differences
Bludit is written in PHP, while Microweber is built with HTML. Bludit is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Microweber. Microweber is the more established project (first released 2013), while Bludit arrived in 2015. Microweber has the considerably larger community, at 3,439 GitHub stars versus 1,469.
Why pick each one
Choose Bludit if…
- Very easy to set up
- Easy to back up
Watch out for
- Not suited to large sites
- Smaller ecosystem
Choose Microweber if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in HTML
Frequently asked questions
Is Bludit or Microweber better?
Neither is universally better. Microweber has the larger community, while Bludit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Bludit and Microweber free and open-source?
Yes. Bludit is licensed under MIT and Microweber under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bludit and Microweber with Docker?
Bludit: yes. Microweber: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Bludit or Microweber?
Bludit has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Microweber. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.