Bludit vs Microweber
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bludit
Simple flat-file CMS for fast websites and blogs
VS
Microweber
Drag-and-drop CMS with built-in online store
| Feature | Bludit | Microweber |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,464 | ★ 3,430 |
| First released | 2015 | 2013 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Wix | WordPress, Wix |
Why pick each one
Choose Microweber if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in HTML
Frequently asked questions
Is Bludit or Microweber better?
Neither is universally better. Microweber has the larger community, while Bludit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Bludit and Microweber free and open-source?
Yes. Bludit is licensed under MIT and Microweber under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bludit and Microweber with Docker?
Bludit: yes. Microweber: yes.