Concrete CMS vs django CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Concrete CMS
In-context editing CMS for marketers and site owners
VS
django CMS
Enterprise CMS built on the Django framework
| Feature | Concrete CMS | django CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 850 | ★ 10,658 |
| First released | 2008 | 2009 |
| Replaces | Wix, Squarespace | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore |
Why pick each one
Choose Concrete CMS if…
- Very approachable for non-technical editors
- No separate admin needed for content
Frequently asked questions
Is Concrete CMS or django CMS better?
Neither is universally better. django CMS has the larger community, while Concrete CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Concrete CMS and django CMS free and open-source?
Yes. Concrete CMS is licensed under MIT and django CMS under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Concrete CMS and django CMS with Docker?
Concrete CMS: yes. django CMS: yes.