Concrete CMS vs Docsify
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Concrete CMS
In-context editing CMS for marketers and site owners
VS
Docsify
Documentation site generator
| Feature | Concrete CMS | Docsify |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 850 | ★ 31,442 |
| First released | 2008 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Wix, Squarespace | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Concrete CMS if…
- Very approachable for non-technical editors
- No separate admin needed for content
Choose Docsify if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 31.4k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Concrete CMS or Docsify better?
Neither is universally better. Docsify has the larger community, while Concrete CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Concrete CMS and Docsify free and open-source?
Yes. Concrete CMS is licensed under MIT and Docsify under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Concrete CMS and Docsify with Docker?
Concrete CMS: yes. Docsify: check the project docs for container support.