Grav vs Lektor
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Grav
Fast flat-file CMS with no database required
VS
Lektor
Static CMS with a built-in admin interface
| Feature | Grav | Lektor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,620 | ★ 3,946 |
| First released | 2014 | 2015 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Squarespace | WordPress, Squarespace |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Grav or Lektor better?
Grav is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Lektor if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Grav and Lektor free and open-source?
Yes. Grav is licensed under MIT and Lektor under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Grav and Lektor with Docker?
Grav: yes. Lektor: check the project docs for container support.