Anchor CMS vs Grav

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAnchor CMSGrav
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePHPPHP
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, docker, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 3,298★ 15,620
First released20122014
ReplacesWordPressWordPress, Squarespace

Why pick each one

Choose Anchor CMS if…

  • Very lightweight
  • Easy installation
Anchor CMS details

Choose Grav if…

  • Trivial to back up and migrate
  • Quick to set up
Grav details

Frequently asked questions

Is Anchor CMS or Grav better?

Neither is universally better. Grav has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Anchor CMS and Grav free and open-source?

Yes. Anchor CMS is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Grav under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Anchor CMS and Grav with Docker?

Anchor CMS: yes. Grav: yes.

Related comparisons