SHSelfHostIndex

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin vs Seafile

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
C closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin Global name system for secure file sharing VS Seafile High-performance file sync and share with block storage
Feature closet GoToSocial NoNo upspinSeafile
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectUnder-an-hour setup
Health score39 · At risk76 · Good
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoC
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 6,404★ 15,273
First released20162012
ReplacesDropboxDropbox, Google Drive

What are closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and Seafile?

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin

Upspin is an experimental framework from Google for naming and sharing files securely across the internet. It gives every file a globally unique name and end-to-end encrypted access control.

  • Global file naming system
  • End-to-end encrypted sharing
  • Fine-grained access groups

Seafile

Seafile is a file sync and share platform built around a reliable, high-performance file storage engine. It is well suited for users and organizations that prioritize fast, reliable sync of large libraries. It is typically deployed via Docker Compose or on bare metal.

  • Fast block-level sync engine
  • Client-side encrypted libraries
  • Reliable handling of large file sets
  • Desktop, mobile and web clients

Read the full Seafile guide →

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin vs Seafile: key differences

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin is written in Go, while Seafile is built with C. Licensing differs — BSD-3-Clause for closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin versus AGPL-3.0 for Seafile. closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Seafile. Seafile is the more established project (first released 2012), while closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin arrived in 2016. Seafile has the considerably larger community, at 15,273 GitHub stars versus 6,404. Seafile lists first-class Docker deployment; closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin does not.

Why pick each one

Choose closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 6.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin details

Choose Seafile if…

  • Excellent sync performance
  • Stable and battle-tested
  • Good for large libraries

Watch out for

  • Fewer collaboration features than Nextcloud
  • Setup more involved than simple tools
Seafile details

Frequently asked questions

Is closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin or Seafile better?

Seafile is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and Seafile free and open-source?

Yes. closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Seafile under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and Seafile with Docker?

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin: check the project docs for container support. Seafile: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin or Seafile?

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Seafile. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons