Dufs vs Seafile
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dufs
Distinctive utility file server with WebDAV support
VS
Seafile
High-performance file sync and share with block storage
| Feature | Dufs | Seafile |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,562 | ★ 15,077 |
| First released | 2022 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, Google Drive | Dropbox, Google Drive |
Why pick each one
Choose Dufs if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10.6k GitHub stars
Choose Seafile if…
- Excellent sync performance
- Stable and battle-tested
- Good for large libraries
Frequently asked questions
Is Dufs or Seafile better?
Neither is universally better. Seafile has the larger community, while Dufs is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Dufs and Seafile free and open-source?
Yes. Dufs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Seafile under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dufs and Seafile with Docker?
Dufs: yes. Seafile: yes.