Cloudreve vs Seafile
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cloudreve
File management and sharing system, supports multiple storage
VS
Seafile
High-performance file sync and share with block storage
| Feature | Cloudreve | Seafile |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,485 | ★ 15,077 |
| First released | 2026 | 2012 |
| Replaces | — | Dropbox, Google Drive |
Why pick each one
Choose Cloudreve if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 28.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose Seafile if…
- Excellent sync performance
- Stable and battle-tested
- Good for large libraries
Frequently asked questions
Is Cloudreve or Seafile better?
Neither is universally better. Cloudreve has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Cloudreve and Seafile free and open-source?
Yes. Cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Seafile under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cloudreve and Seafile with Docker?
Cloudreve: yes. Seafile: yes.