FileBrowser Quantum vs Seafile
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FileBrowser Quantum
Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features
VS
Seafile
High-performance file sync and share with block storage
| Feature | FileBrowser Quantum | Seafile |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,695 | ★ 15,077 |
| First released | 2024 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Dropbox | Dropbox, Google Drive |
Why pick each one
Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
Choose Seafile if…
- Excellent sync performance
- Stable and battle-tested
- Good for large libraries
Frequently asked questions
Is FileBrowser Quantum or Seafile better?
Neither is universally better. Seafile has the larger community, while FileBrowser Quantum is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are FileBrowser Quantum and Seafile free and open-source?
Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Seafile under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and Seafile with Docker?
FileBrowser Quantum: yes. Seafile: yes.