File Browser vs Seafile

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserSeafile
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoC
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 15,077
First released20172012
ReplacesDropboxDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Seafile if…

  • Excellent sync performance
  • Stable and battle-tested
  • Good for large libraries
Seafile details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Seafile better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Seafile if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Seafile free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Seafile under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Seafile with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Seafile: yes.

Related comparisons