Todoman Web vs Tracks
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Todoman Web | Tracks |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 64 · Good | 62 · Good |
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | ISC | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 596 | ★ 1,239 |
| First released | 2015 | 2004 |
| Replaces | Todoist, Microsoft To Do | Todoist, OmniFocus |
What are Todoman Web and Tracks?
Todoman Web
A task management tool built around the CalDAV standard so tasks sync with standard calendar servers and clients. It lets users manage to-do lists across devices using open protocols.
- CalDAV task sync
- Standard VTODO format
- Command-line interface
- Works with many servers
Tracks
Tracks is a web-based application designed to help you implement the Getting Things Done methodology. It organizes tasks into projects and contexts with a focus on personal productivity.
- GTD contexts and projects
- Next-action tracking
- Recurring todos
- Mobile-friendly interface
Todoman Web vs Tracks: key differences
Todoman Web is written in Python, while Tracks is built with Ruby. Licensing differs — ISC for Todoman Web versus GPL-2.0 for Tracks. Todoman Web is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Tracks. Tracks is the more established project (first released 2004), while Todoman Web arrived in 2015. Tracks has the considerably larger community, at 1,239 GitHub stars versus 596. Tracks lists first-class Docker deployment; Todoman Web does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Todoman Web if…
- Open standards based
- Syncs with calendar apps
Watch out for
- Command-line focused
- No native web UI
Choose Tracks if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is Todoman Web or Tracks better?
Neither is universally better. Tracks has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Todoman Web and Tracks free and open-source?
Yes. Todoman Web is licensed under ISC and Tracks under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Todoman Web and Tracks with Docker?
Todoman Web: check the project docs for container support. Tracks: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Todoman Web or Tracks?
Todoman Web has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Tracks. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.