Habitica Self-Hosted vs Todoman Web

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHabitica Self-HostedTodoman Web
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupRead-the-docs project
Health score94 · Excellent64 · Good
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseGPL-3.0ISC
LanguageJavaScriptPython
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 14,173★ 596
First released20132015
ReplacesTodoist, HabiticaTodoist, Microsoft To Do

What are Habitica Self-Hosted and Todoman Web?

Habitica Self-Hosted

A gamified task, habit, and to-do manager that turns personal productivity into a role-playing game with rewards and parties. The full stack can be self-hosted for private use.

  • Gamified habits and tasks
  • Rewards and avatars
  • Parties and challenges
  • Mobile apps

Read the full Habitica Self-Hosted guide →

Todoman Web

A task management tool built around the CalDAV standard so tasks sync with standard calendar servers and clients. It lets users manage to-do lists across devices using open protocols.

  • CalDAV task sync
  • Standard VTODO format
  • Command-line interface
  • Works with many servers

Habitica Self-Hosted vs Todoman Web: key differences

Habitica Self-Hosted is written in JavaScript, while Todoman Web is built with Python. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for Habitica Self-Hosted versus ISC for Todoman Web. Todoman Web is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for Habitica Self-Hosted. Habitica Self-Hosted is the more established project (first released 2013), while Todoman Web arrived in 2015. Habitica Self-Hosted has the considerably larger community, at 14,173 GitHub stars versus 596. Habitica Self-Hosted lists first-class Docker deployment; Todoman Web does not.

Why pick each one

Choose Habitica Self-Hosted if…

  • Motivating gameplay
  • Active community

Watch out for

  • Heavy to self-host
  • Setup is involved
Habitica Self-Hosted details

Choose Todoman Web if…

  • Open standards based
  • Syncs with calendar apps

Watch out for

  • Command-line focused
  • No native web UI
Todoman Web details

Frequently asked questions

Is Habitica Self-Hosted or Todoman Web better?

Neither is universally better. Habitica Self-Hosted has the larger community, while Todoman Web is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Habitica Self-Hosted and Todoman Web free and open-source?

Yes. Habitica Self-Hosted is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Todoman Web under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Habitica Self-Hosted and Todoman Web with Docker?

Habitica Self-Hosted: yes. Todoman Web: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, Habitica Self-Hosted or Todoman Web?

Todoman Web has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for Habitica Self-Hosted. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons