Super Productivity vs Todoman Web
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Super Productivity | Todoman Web |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 96 · Excellent | 64 · Good |
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | MIT | ISC |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 22,224 | ★ 596 |
| First released | 2018 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Todoist, Things | Todoist, Microsoft To Do |
What are Super Productivity and Todoman Web?
Super Productivity
Super Productivity is an advanced to-do list app with integrated time tracking and task management. It can sync with issue trackers and works fully offline.
- Integrated time tracking
- Pomodoro and focus mode
- Jira and GitHub integration
- Offline-first with WebDAV sync
Todoman Web
A task management tool built around the CalDAV standard so tasks sync with standard calendar servers and clients. It lets users manage to-do lists across devices using open protocols.
- CalDAV task sync
- Standard VTODO format
- Command-line interface
- Works with many servers
Super Productivity vs Todoman Web: key differences
Super Productivity is written in TypeScript, while Todoman Web is built with Python. Licensing differs — MIT for Super Productivity versus ISC for Todoman Web. Todoman Web is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Super Productivity. Todoman Web is the more established project (first released 2015), while Super Productivity arrived in 2018. Super Productivity has the considerably larger community, at 22,224 GitHub stars versus 596.
Why pick each one
Choose Super Productivity if…
- Time tracking built in
- Jira and GitHub sync
- Works fully offline
Watch out for
- Single-user focus
- Sync setup manual
Choose Todoman Web if…
- Open standards based
- Syncs with calendar apps
Watch out for
- Command-line focused
- No native web UI
Frequently asked questions
Is Super Productivity or Todoman Web better?
Super Productivity is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Todoman Web if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Super Productivity and Todoman Web free and open-source?
Yes. Super Productivity is licensed under MIT and Todoman Web under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Super Productivity and Todoman Web with Docker?
Super Productivity: check the project docs for container support. Todoman Web: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Super Productivity or Todoman Web?
Todoman Web has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Super Productivity. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Super Productivity vs Donetick
- Todoman Web vs Donetick
- Super Productivity vs Habitica Self-Hosted
- Todoman Web vs Habitica Self-Hosted
- Super Productivity vs Taskell
- Super Productivity vs TaskLite
- Todoman Web vs TaskLite
- Super Productivity vs Taskwarrior
- Todoman Web vs Taskwarrior
- Super Productivity vs Tracks
- Todoman Web vs Tracks