Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare vs XBackBone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureResilio Sync alternative OnionshareXBackBone
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB50 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 7,055★ 1,161
First released20142023
ReplacesWeTransfer, DropboxWeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare details

Choose XBackBone if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
XBackBone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare or XBackBone better?

Neither is universally better. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare has the larger community, while XBackBone is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare and XBackBone free and open-source?

Yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare is licensed under GPL-3.0 and XBackBone under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare and XBackBone with Docker?

Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support. XBackBone: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons