SHSelfHostIndex

Sulu vs Umbraco

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
SU Sulu Symfony-based CMS for business and enterprise websites VS UM Umbraco Friendly open-source .NET content management system
FeatureSuluUmbraco
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePHPC#
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 1,347★ 5,224
First released20152005
ReplacesAdobe Experience Manager, SitecoreSitecore, Kentico

Why pick each one

Choose Sulu if…

  • Great for Symfony developers
  • Solid for business sites
Sulu details

Choose Umbraco if…

  • Great choice on the .NET stack
  • Polished editor experience
Umbraco details

Frequently asked questions

Is Sulu or Umbraco better?

Umbraco is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Sulu if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Sulu and Umbraco free and open-source?

Yes. Sulu is licensed under MIT and Umbraco under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Sulu and Umbraco with Docker?

Sulu: yes. Umbraco: yes.

Related comparisons