SHSelfHostIndex

Silverstripe CMS vs Umbraco

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
SI Silverstripe CMS Developer-friendly CMS with a clean admin interface VS UM Umbraco Friendly open-source .NET content management system
FeatureSilverstripe CMSUmbraco
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseMIT
LanguagePHPC#
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 722★ 5,224
First released20072005
ReplacesSitecore, KenticoSitecore, Kentico

Why pick each one

Choose Silverstripe CMS if…

  • Great balance of CMS and framework
  • Pleasant editor experience
Silverstripe CMS details

Choose Umbraco if…

  • Great choice on the .NET stack
  • Polished editor experience
Umbraco details

Frequently asked questions

Is Silverstripe CMS or Umbraco better?

Neither is universally better. Umbraco has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Silverstripe CMS and Umbraco free and open-source?

Yes. Silverstripe CMS is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Umbraco under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Silverstripe CMS and Umbraco with Docker?

Silverstripe CMS: yes. Umbraco: yes.

Related comparisons