Silverstripe CMS vs Sulu
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Silverstripe CMS
Developer-friendly CMS with a clean admin interface
VS
Sulu
Symfony-based CMS for business and enterprise websites
| Feature | Silverstripe CMS | Sulu |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 722 | ★ 1,347 |
| First released | 2007 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Sitecore, Kentico | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore |
Why pick each one
Choose Silverstripe CMS if…
- Great balance of CMS and framework
- Pleasant editor experience
Frequently asked questions
Is Silverstripe CMS or Sulu better?
Neither is universally better. Sulu has the larger community, while Silverstripe CMS is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Silverstripe CMS and Sulu free and open-source?
Yes. Silverstripe CMS is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Sulu under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Silverstripe CMS and Sulu with Docker?
Silverstripe CMS: yes. Sulu: yes.