Sulu vs TYPO3
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Sulu
Symfony-based CMS for business and enterprise websites
VS
TYPO3
Enterprise CMS popular for large corporate websites
| Feature | Sulu | TYPO3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,347 | ★ 1,200 |
| First released | 2015 | 1998 |
| Replaces | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Sulu or TYPO3 better?
Neither is universally better. Sulu has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Sulu and TYPO3 free and open-source?
Yes. Sulu is licensed under MIT and TYPO3 under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Sulu and TYPO3 with Docker?
Sulu: yes. TYPO3: yes.