Orchard Core vs Sulu
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Orchard Core
Modular, multi-tenant CMS built on ASP.NET Core
VS
Sulu
Symfony-based CMS for business and enterprise websites
| Feature | Orchard Core | Sulu |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | C# | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,148 | ★ 1,347 |
| First released | 2018 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Sitecore, WordPress | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Orchard Core or Sulu better?
Neither is universally better. Orchard Core has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Orchard Core and Sulu free and open-source?
Yes. Orchard Core is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Sulu under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Orchard Core and Sulu with Docker?
Orchard Core: yes. Sulu: yes.