Stork vs tinysearch
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stork
Fast, accessible static site search in WebAssembly
VS
tinysearch
Tiny WebAssembly-powered static site search
| Feature | Stork | tinysearch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,758 | ★ 2,953 |
| First released | 2019 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Algolia | Algolia |
Why pick each one
Choose tinysearch if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Stork or tinysearch better?
Neither is universally better. tinysearch has the larger community, while Stork is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Stork and tinysearch free and open-source?
Yes. Stork is licensed under Apache-2.0 and tinysearch under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stork and tinysearch with Docker?
Stork: check the project docs for container support. tinysearch: check the project docs for container support.