Apache Solr vs Stork
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache Solr
Enterprise-grade open-source search platform
VS
Stork
Fast, accessible static site search in WebAssembly
| Feature | Apache Solr | Stork |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,650 | ★ 2,758 |
| First released | 2006 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch, Algolia | Algolia |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache Solr or Stork better?
Stork is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Apache Solr if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Apache Solr and Stork free and open-source?
Yes. Apache Solr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Stork under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache Solr and Stork with Docker?
Apache Solr: yes. Stork: check the project docs for container support.