bleve vs Stork

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturebleveStork
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectRead-the-docs project
Health score93 · Excellent18 · At risk
CategorySearch EnginesSearch Engines
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentsource, binarybinary, source
GitHub stars★ 11,228★ 2,760
First released20142019
ReplacesElasticsearch, AlgoliaAlgolia

What are bleve and Stork?

bleve

An embeddable modern full-text search and indexing library that lets developers add search to applications without running a separate server. It supports analyzers, faceting, and scoring out of the box.

  • Embeddable index
  • Text analyzers
  • Faceted search
  • Pluggable storage

Read the full bleve guide →

Stork

Stork is an open-source tool that builds a search index from your content and serves instant search on static sites using WebAssembly. It is small, fast, and requires no server-side component.

  • WebAssembly search
  • Static index files
  • No backend
  • Accessible UI

Read the full Stork guide →

bleve vs Stork: key differences

Bleve is written in Go, while Stork is built with Rust. Stork is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for bleve. Bleve is the more established project (first released 2014), while Stork arrived in 2019. Bleve has the considerably larger community, at 11,228 GitHub stars versus 2,760.

Why pick each one

Choose bleve if…

  • No separate server
  • Pure Go integration

Watch out for

  • Library not turnkey app
  • Manual scaling
bleve details

Choose Stork if…

  • Instant client-side results
  • Easy integration

Watch out for

  • Best for smaller sites
  • Manual index builds
Stork details

Frequently asked questions

Is bleve or Stork better?

Neither is universally better. bleve has the larger community, while Stork is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are bleve and Stork free and open-source?

Yes. bleve is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Stork under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run bleve and Stork with Docker?

bleve: check the project docs for container support. Stork: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, bleve or Stork?

Stork has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for bleve. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons