lnx vs Stork
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
lnx
Fast, fault-tolerant search engine built on Tantivy
VS
Stork
Fast, accessible static site search in WebAssembly
| Feature | lnx | Stork |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,449 | ★ 2,758 |
| First released | 2021 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch, Algolia | Algolia |
Why pick each one
Choose lnx if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
Frequently asked questions
Is lnx or Stork better?
Stork is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider lnx if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are lnx and Stork free and open-source?
Yes. lnx is licensed under MIT and Stork under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run lnx and Stork with Docker?
lnx: yes. Stork: check the project docs for container support.