Apache Solr vs lnx
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache Solr
Enterprise-grade open-source search platform
VS
lnx
Fast, fault-tolerant search engine built on Tantivy
| Feature | Apache Solr | lnx |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,650 | ★ 1,449 |
| First released | 2006 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch, Algolia | Elasticsearch, Algolia |
Why pick each one
Choose lnx if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache Solr or lnx better?
Neither is universally better. Apache Solr has the larger community, while lnx is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Apache Solr and lnx free and open-source?
Yes. Apache Solr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lnx under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache Solr and lnx with Docker?
Apache Solr: yes. lnx: yes.