Apache Solr vs tinysearch
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache Solr
Enterprise-grade open-source search platform
VS
tinysearch
Tiny WebAssembly-powered static site search
| Feature | Apache Solr | tinysearch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,650 | ★ 2,953 |
| First released | 2006 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch, Algolia | Algolia |
Why pick each one
Choose tinysearch if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache Solr or tinysearch better?
tinysearch is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Apache Solr if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Apache Solr and tinysearch free and open-source?
Yes. Apache Solr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and tinysearch under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache Solr and tinysearch with Docker?
Apache Solr: yes. tinysearch: check the project docs for container support.