Shinobi vs RtspToWeb

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureShinobiRtspToWeb
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageJavaScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 4,000★ 1,689
First released20172021
ReplacesBlue Irisgo2rtc

Why pick each one

Choose Shinobi if…

  • Flexible camera support
  • Active community
Shinobi details

Choose RtspToWeb if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
RtspToWeb details

Frequently asked questions

Is Shinobi or RtspToWeb better?

Neither is universally better. Shinobi has the larger community, while RtspToWeb is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Shinobi and RtspToWeb free and open-source?

Yes. Shinobi is licensed under GPL-3.0 and RtspToWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Shinobi and RtspToWeb with Docker?

Shinobi: yes. RtspToWeb: yes.

Related comparisons