Cameradar vs RtspToWeb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cameradar
RTSP stream discovery and access-auditing tool for cameras
VS
RtspToWeb
Restream RTSP camera feeds to web browsers
| Feature | Cameradar | RtspToWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,147 | ★ 1,689 |
| First released | 2016 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Commercial camera audit tools | go2rtc |
Why pick each one
Choose RtspToWeb if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Cameradar or RtspToWeb better?
Neither is universally better. Cameradar has the larger community, while RtspToWeb is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cameradar and RtspToWeb free and open-source?
Yes. Cameradar is licensed under MIT and RtspToWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cameradar and RtspToWeb with Docker?
Cameradar: yes. RtspToWeb: yes.