CompreFace vs RtspToWeb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CompreFace
Self-hosted face recognition service with REST API
VS
RtspToWeb
Restream RTSP camera feeds to web browsers
| Feature | CompreFace | RtspToWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,173 | ★ 1,689 |
| First released | 2020 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Amazon Rekognition | go2rtc |
Why pick each one
Choose RtspToWeb if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is CompreFace or RtspToWeb better?
Neither is universally better. CompreFace has the larger community, while RtspToWeb is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CompreFace and RtspToWeb free and open-source?
Yes. CompreFace is licensed under Apache-2.0 and RtspToWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CompreFace and RtspToWeb with Docker?
CompreFace: yes. RtspToWeb: yes.