Seafile vs WebDAV Server Go
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Seafile | WebDAV Server Go |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 76 · Good | 90 · Excellent |
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,273 | ★ 5,877 |
| First released | 2012 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, Google Drive | Dropbox |
What are Seafile and WebDAV Server Go?
Seafile
Seafile is a file sync and share platform built around a reliable, high-performance file storage engine. It is well suited for users and organizations that prioritize fast, reliable sync of large libraries. It is typically deployed via Docker Compose or on bare metal.
- Fast block-level sync engine
- Client-side encrypted libraries
- Reliable handling of large file sets
- Desktop, mobile and web clients
WebDAV Server Go
A lightweight standalone WebDAV server that exposes a directory tree for syncing with WebDAV-capable clients. It is useful as a minimal sync backend for many file managers and apps.
- Standalone WebDAV
- Per-user permissions
- Minimal backend
- Cross-platform clients
Seafile vs WebDAV Server Go: key differences
Seafile is written in C, while WebDAV Server Go is built with Go. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for Seafile versus MIT for WebDAV Server Go. WebDAV Server Go is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Seafile. Seafile is the more established project (first released 2012), while WebDAV Server Go arrived in 2017. Seafile has the considerably larger community, at 15,273 GitHub stars versus 5,877.
Why pick each one
Choose Seafile if…
- Excellent sync performance
- Stable and battle-tested
- Good for large libraries
Watch out for
- Fewer collaboration features than Nextcloud
- Setup more involved than simple tools
Choose WebDAV Server Go if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.9k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Seafile or WebDAV Server Go better?
Neither is universally better. Seafile has the larger community, while WebDAV Server Go is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Seafile and WebDAV Server Go free and open-source?
Yes. Seafile is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WebDAV Server Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Seafile and WebDAV Server Go with Docker?
Seafile: yes. WebDAV Server Go: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Seafile or WebDAV Server Go?
WebDAV Server Go has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Seafile. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Seafile vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- WebDAV Server Go vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- Seafile vs Ceph
- Seafile vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- WebDAV Server Go vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- Seafile vs Cloudreve
- Seafile vs copyparty
- WebDAV Server Go vs copyparty
- Seafile vs CryptPad
- Seafile vs Dufs
- WebDAV Server Go vs Dufs