Seafile vs WebDAV Server Go
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Seafile
High-performance file sync and share with block storage
VS
WebDAV Server Go
Lightweight standalone WebDAV file server
| Feature | Seafile | WebDAV Server Go |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,077 | ★ 5,750 |
| First released | 2012 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, Google Drive | Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose Seafile if…
- Excellent sync performance
- Stable and battle-tested
- Good for large libraries
Choose WebDAV Server Go if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.8k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Seafile or WebDAV Server Go better?
Neither is universally better. Seafile has the larger community, while WebDAV Server Go is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Seafile and WebDAV Server Go free and open-source?
Yes. Seafile is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WebDAV Server Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Seafile and WebDAV Server Go with Docker?
Seafile: yes. WebDAV Server Go: yes.