SHSelfHostIndex

Syncthing Android Wrapper vs WebDAV Server Go

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
SY Syncthing Android Wrapper Archived Official Android client for Syncthing sync VS WE WebDAV Server Go Lightweight standalone WebDAV file server
FeatureSyncthing Android WrapperWebDAV Server Go
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectUnder-an-hour setup
Health score15 · At risk90 · Excellent
StatusArchivedActively maintained
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMPL-2.0MIT
LanguageJavaGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 4,283★ 5,877
First released20152017
ReplacesDropbox, Google PhotosDropbox

What are Syncthing Android Wrapper and WebDAV Server Go?

Syncthing Android Wrapper

The official Syncthing Android app embeds the Syncthing core to provide continuous peer-to-peer file synchronization on mobile devices. It syncs photos and documents without any central server.

  • Mobile peer-to-peer sync
  • Photo backup folders
  • No central server
  • Encrypted transfers

WebDAV Server Go

A lightweight standalone WebDAV server that exposes a directory tree for syncing with WebDAV-capable clients. It is useful as a minimal sync backend for many file managers and apps.

  • Standalone WebDAV
  • Per-user permissions
  • Minimal backend
  • Cross-platform clients

Syncthing Android Wrapper vs WebDAV Server Go: key differences

The biggest difference is maintenance: Syncthing Android Wrapper's repository is archived and no longer developed, while WebDAV Server Go is actively maintained. Syncthing Android Wrapper is written in Java, while WebDAV Server Go is built with Go. Licensing differs — MPL-2.0 for Syncthing Android Wrapper versus MIT for WebDAV Server Go. WebDAV Server Go is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for Syncthing Android Wrapper. Syncthing Android Wrapper is the more established project (first released 2015), while WebDAV Server Go arrived in 2017. WebDAV Server Go lists first-class Docker deployment; Syncthing Android Wrapper does not.

Why pick each one

Choose Syncthing Android Wrapper if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Java
Syncthing Android Wrapper details

Choose WebDAV Server Go if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.9k GitHub stars
WebDAV Server Go details

Frequently asked questions

Is Syncthing Android Wrapper or WebDAV Server Go better?

Neither is universally better. WebDAV Server Go has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Syncthing Android Wrapper and WebDAV Server Go free and open-source?

Yes. Syncthing Android Wrapper is licensed under MPL-2.0 and WebDAV Server Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Syncthing Android Wrapper and WebDAV Server Go with Docker?

Syncthing Android Wrapper: check the project docs for container support. WebDAV Server Go: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Syncthing Android Wrapper or WebDAV Server Go?

WebDAV Server Go has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for Syncthing Android Wrapper. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons