Password Pusher vs Cryptgeon
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Password Pusher
Dead-simple application to securely communicate passwords (or text)
VS
Cryptgeon
Encrypted note and file sharing with self-destruct
| Feature | Password Pusher | Cryptgeon |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Svelte |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,145 | ★ 1,497 |
| First released | 2026 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | PrivateBin, One-Time Secret |
Why pick each one
Choose Password Pusher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Choose Cryptgeon if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Password Pusher or Cryptgeon better?
Neither is universally better. Password Pusher has the larger community, while Cryptgeon is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Password Pusher and Cryptgeon free and open-source?
Yes. Password Pusher is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Cryptgeon under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Password Pusher and Cryptgeon with Docker?
Password Pusher: yes. Cryptgeon: yes.