dpaste vs Password Pusher
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
dpaste
Django-based pastebin for code and text snippets
VS
Password Pusher
Dead-simple application to securely communicate passwords (or text)
| Feature | dpaste | Password Pusher |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 642 | ★ 3,145 |
| First released | 2011 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Pastebin.com, GitHub Gist | — |
Why pick each one
Choose dpaste if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Choose Password Pusher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is dpaste or Password Pusher better?
Neither is universally better. Password Pusher has the larger community, while dpaste is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are dpaste and Password Pusher free and open-source?
Yes. dpaste is licensed under MIT and Password Pusher under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run dpaste and Password Pusher with Docker?
dpaste: yes. Password Pusher: yes.