filite vs Password Pusher
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
filite
Lightweight self-hosted store for files, links and pastes
VS
Password Pusher
Dead-simple application to securely communicate passwords (or text)
| Feature | filite | Password Pusher |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 189 | ★ 3,145 |
| First released | 2019 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Imgur, Pastebin.com | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Password Pusher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is filite or Password Pusher better?
Neither is universally better. Password Pusher has the larger community, while filite is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are filite and Password Pusher free and open-source?
Yes. filite is licensed under MIT and Password Pusher under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run filite and Password Pusher with Docker?
filite: yes. Password Pusher: yes.