ByteStash vs filite
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ByteStash
Pastebin and file storage service with a simple web interface
VS
filite
Lightweight self-hosted store for files, links and pastes
| Feature | ByteStash | filite |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,514 | ★ 189 |
| First released | 2026 | 2019 |
| Replaces | — | Imgur, Pastebin.com |
Why pick each one
Choose ByteStash if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is ByteStash or filite better?
Neither is universally better. ByteStash has the larger community, while filite is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ByteStash and filite free and open-source?
Yes. ByteStash is licensed under GPL-3.0 and filite under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ByteStash and filite with Docker?
ByteStash: yes. filite: yes.