ByteStash vs dpaste
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ByteStash
Pastebin and file storage service with a simple web interface
VS
dpaste
Django-based pastebin for code and text snippets
| Feature | ByteStash | dpaste |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,514 | ★ 642 |
| First released | 2026 | 2011 |
| Replaces | — | Pastebin.com, GitHub Gist |
Why pick each one
Choose ByteStash if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Choose dpaste if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is ByteStash or dpaste better?
Neither is universally better. ByteStash has the larger community, while dpaste is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ByteStash and dpaste free and open-source?
Yes. ByteStash is licensed under GPL-3.0 and dpaste under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ByteStash and dpaste with Docker?
ByteStash: yes. dpaste: yes.