Lutim vs filite
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lutim
Privacy-focused image hosting with auto-expiration
VS
filite
Lightweight self-hosted store for files, links and pastes
| Feature | Lutim | filite |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Perl | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 300 | ★ 189 |
| First released | 2015 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Imgur | Imgur, Pastebin.com |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Lutim or filite better?
Neither is universally better. Lutim has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Lutim and filite free and open-source?
Yes. Lutim is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and filite under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lutim and filite with Docker?
Lutim: yes. filite: yes.