Lutim vs Chibisafe
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lutim
Privacy-focused image hosting with auto-expiration
VS
Chibisafe
Modern and self-hosted file uploader
| Feature | Lutim | Chibisafe |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Perl | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 300 | ★ 2,748 |
| First released | 2015 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Imgur | Imgur, Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose Chibisafe if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Lutim or Chibisafe better?
Neither is universally better. Chibisafe has the larger community, while Lutim is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Lutim and Chibisafe free and open-source?
Yes. Lutim is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Chibisafe under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lutim and Chibisafe with Docker?
Lutim: yes. Chibisafe: yes.