0bin vs Password Pusher
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
0bin
Client-side encrypted pastebin requiring no user accounts
VS
Password Pusher
Dead-simple application to securely communicate passwords (or text)
| Feature | 0bin | Password Pusher |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | WTFPL | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,405 | ★ 3,145 |
| First released | 2012 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Pastebin.com | — |
Why pick each one
Choose 0bin if…
- Released under the WTFPL license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
Choose Password Pusher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is 0bin or Password Pusher better?
Neither is universally better. Password Pusher has the larger community, while 0bin is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are 0bin and Password Pusher free and open-source?
Yes. 0bin is licensed under WTFPL and Password Pusher under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run 0bin and Password Pusher with Docker?
0bin: yes. Password Pusher: yes.