0bin vs Chiyogami
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
0bin
Client-side encrypted pastebin requiring no user accounts
VS
Chiyogami
Pastebin with API, client-side encryption, user accounts, syntax
| Feature | 0bin | Chiyogami |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | WTFPL | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | JavaScript | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,405 | ★ 79 |
| First released | 2012 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Pastebin.com | — |
Why pick each one
Choose 0bin if…
- Released under the WTFPL license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
Choose Chiyogami if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in HTML
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is 0bin or Chiyogami better?
0bin is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Chiyogami if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are 0bin and Chiyogami free and open-source?
Yes. 0bin is licensed under WTFPL and Chiyogami under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run 0bin and Chiyogami with Docker?
0bin: yes. Chiyogami: yes.