Chiyogami vs Password Pusher
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Chiyogami
Pastebin with API, client-side encryption, user accounts, syntax
VS
Password Pusher
Dead-simple application to securely communicate passwords (or text)
| Feature | Chiyogami | Password Pusher |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | HTML | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 79 | ★ 3,145 |
| First released | 2026 | 2026 |
| Replaces | — | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Chiyogami if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in HTML
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Password Pusher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Chiyogami or Password Pusher better?
Neither is universally better. Password Pusher has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Chiyogami and Password Pusher free and open-source?
Yes. Chiyogami is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Password Pusher under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Chiyogami and Password Pusher with Docker?
Chiyogami: yes. Password Pusher: yes.